www.equalitymaryland.org

Dear Friends

The next few weeks may be the most pivotal ever for LGBT civil rights in Maryland.

Our opposition has ignited their own grassroots, and now calls are flooding the offices of the members of the Judiciary Committee asking them to support these bills and "protect the family." In addition, President Bush announced his support of a federal constitutional marriage amendment today, adding fuel to the fire.

Please take action immediately!! Contact the members of the Committee and let them know that you oppose the anti-gay bills being heard tomorrow. Talking points and bill numbers are below. Please be level-headed and courteous in all of your communications. Don't leave this task to someone else - in order to be effective, EVERYONE must step up to the plate and make sure our voices are heard!

For more information, please e-mail dan@equalitymaryland.org.

In partnership and equality,
Dan Furmansky
Executive Director
dan@equalitymaryland.org

If you are calling from a 410 area code, dial 410-841 - plus the 4 digit number.
If you are calling from a 301 area code, dial 301-858-plus the 4 digit number.
Chairman: Room Phone District E-mail
Joseph F. Vallario, Jr. (D), Vice Chairman 121 3488 27A joseph_vallario@house.state.md.us
Anthony G. Brown (D) 121 3909 25 anthony_brown@house.state.md.us
Carmen Amedori (R) 322 3371 5A carmen_amedori@house.state.md.us
Curtis S. Anderson (D) 317 3291 43 curt_anderson@house.state.md.us
Jill P. Carter (D) 317 3283 41 jill_carter@house.state.md.us
Kathleen M. Dumais (D) 226 3052 15 kathleen_dumais@house.state.md.us
Donald H. Dwyer, Jr. (R) 213 3206 31 don_dwyer@house.state.md.us
Ana Sol Gutierrez (D) 223 3028 18 ana_gutierrez@house.state.md.us
W. Louis Hennessy (R) 216 3247 28 louis_hennessy@house.state.md.us
Darryl A. Kelley (D) 205 3012 26 darryl_kelley@house.state.md.us
Kevin Kelly (D) 320 3404 1B kevin_kelly@house.state.md.us
Susan C. Lee (D) 221 3019 16 susan_lee@house.state.md.us
Susan K. McComas (R) 326 3289 35 susan_mccomas@house.state.md.us
Herbert H. McMillan (R) 216 3439 30 herb_mcmillan@house.state.md.us
Pauline H. Menes (D) 210 3114 21 pauline_menes@house.state.md.us
Anthony J. O'Donnell (R) 216 3314 29C anthony_Odonnell@house.state.md.us
Carol S. Petzold (D) 222 3001 19 carol_stoker_petzold@house.state.md.us
Neil Quinter (D) 206 3246 13 neil_quinter@house.state.md.us
Christopher B. Shank (R) 321 3447 2B christopher_shank@house.state.md.us
Luiz R. S. Simmons (D) 225 3037 17 luiz_simmons@house.state.md.us
Theodore Sophocleus (D) 214 3233 32 ted_sophocleus@house.state.md.us
Robert A. Zirkin (D) 304 3342 11 bobby_zirkin@house.state.md.us
-

Maryland State Officials Contacts
Robert Ehrlich (Governor)
Attorney General: J. Joseph Curran (D)
Comptroller: William Donald Schaefer (D)
Lt. Governor: Michael S. Steele (R)
Secretary of State: R. Karl Aumann (R)
Treasurer: Nancy K. Kopp (D)

Senator Paul Sarbanes (D-MD)
Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)

Local elected officials in Maryland

 
These are the 1,049 federal statutory provisions classified to the United States Code in which benefits, rights, and privileges are contingent on marital status.

OPPOSE House Bill 728/Senate Bill 746
So-Called "Defense of Marriage" Act
HB 728/SB 746 would declare that "marriages between individuals of the same sex are against the public policy of this state" and prohibit Maryland from recognizing marriages between two individuals of the same-sex performed in other states.

  • This legislation is redundant. A section of Maryland Family Code already states "only a marriage between a man and a woman is valid in this State." Furthermore, under the Federal Defense of Marriage Act, passed in 1996, no state can be forced to recognize a marriage between same-sex couples performed in another state.
  • This legislation is an assault on a segment of Marylanders simply because of their sexual orientation. It is a blatant attempt by legislators frightened of social change to cast aspersions against a group of tax-paying citizens -- simply because other states are now grappling with how they will recognize families headed by same-sex couples in their own jurisdictions.
  • Gay and lesbian Marylanders are your neighbors. They pay taxes and make valuable contributions - serving as firefighters, police officers, in the military, as emergency room doctors - and work just as hard as every citizen in this state. Denying them the right to marry takes legal rights away from them and their children - including the right to visit a loved one in the hospital, to Social Security survivor benefits, to take time to care for a sick family member without worrying about losing their job, to inherit a partner's property, to sponsor a spouse for immigration purposes, continued health insurance upon the loss of a job, legal protections for children, and more than 1,000 other legal protections, benefits rights, and obligations.
  • Legislators in Maryland should be looking at ways to remove the cloak of discrimination against same-sex couples -- just as California, Vermont, Hawaii, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Massachusetts have done -- not contemplating ways to further codify the discrimination that exists in Maryland's Family Law Code.
  • Marriage is not a word - it is a license offered by the State that provides benefits, rights, and protections upon families. Churches and other religious institutions will never be required to perform ceremonies with which they disagree, even if Maryland took the bold step of offering a government-issued contract to same-sex couples.
  • Marriage equality for same-sex couples IS a civil rights issue, and a simple matter of equal protection and equal rights under the law.

OPPOSE House Bill 16/Senate Bill 673
So-Called "Defense of Marriage" Constitutional Amendment
HB 16/SB 673 would amend the Maryland Constitution to say "only a marriage between a man and a woman is valid in this State." HB 16 would require passage by three-fifths of the legislators in both Houses of the General Assembly and ratification by voters on the November 2004 ballot in order to succeed.

  • Despite any rhetoric otherwise, this legislation is designed to make a negative statement about families headed by same-sex couples. Maryland does not recognize the relationships of gay and lesbian couples, even if they have been together for forty years. A same-sex couple is considered virtual strangers in the eyes of the law.
  • A section of Maryland Family Code already states "only a marriage between a man and a woman is valid in this State." This legislation is a divisive attempt by mean-spirited legislators to pour salt in the wound of families who are already discriminated against by the State.
  • The Maryland Constitution ensures equal treatment for ALL Marylanders. Amending our most sacred state document to single out a group of people for discrimination is radical and wrong. The Constitution should be used to confer rights and protections, not codify existing discrimination and treat one group of Marylanders different from others.
  • Sodomy laws were used for decades to stigmatize gay and lesbian Americans, deny them anti-discrimination protections, and justify denying them custody of their children. This legislation is no different. A constitutional amendment of this ilk would permanently stain the relationships of gay and lesbian couples, brand LGBT Marylanders as second class citizens, and negatively impact the children who are raised by same-sex parents.
  • This legislation is bad politics. Marylanders are most concerned about REAL issues like the economy, jobs, schools, and healthcare -- not finding ways to further discriminate against gays and lesbians.
  • Issues involving civil marriage between gays and lesbians should be dealt with through regular laws and legislation, instead of rushing through the extraordinary step of passing an amendment to the State Constitution.